Transformation isn’t disruption - it’s discipline
- Irina Lindquist

- Oct 26
- 5 min read
Updated: Oct 30
Everyone celebrates disruption. Few stay for the hard part: the discipline it takes to make change endure.

Disruption makes headlines. Transformation delivers outcomes. But across Australia, we’ve become too fond of talking about transformation as if it’s a single, dramatic event. Like something that happens fast and fixes everything. In reality, genuine transformation is quieter, harder, and much more disciplined.
The Bureau of Meteorology’s new $4 million website, launched this month as part of an $866 million transformation program, is a perfect example. It was meant to modernise the way Australians access weather data. Instead, it’s made life harder for the people who rely on it most. Farmers across South Australia have called it clunky and less useful than the old site. What they needed wasn’t a fresh interface. It was reliable, timely information that supports real decisions.
The intention was sound. The delivery wasn’t terrible. But the discipline was missing: alignment between design, purpose and measurable value. The result? A moment of disruption instead of a sustained lift in performance.
True transformation doesn’t rely on hype. It’s not about noise or novelty. It’s about clear intent, steady alignment and consistency over time. It’s the discipline to turn aspiration into capability and keep it there when the spotlight moves on.
That’s why at Angsana, we define transformation not as disruption, but as discipline: the daily practice of focus, alignment, delivery and continuity.
The buzz around “disruption”
Every strategy paper and press release seems to use the word disruption. It’s exciting. It sounds bold. But when we treat disruption as the goal, we end up with noise without movement and activity without traction.
Disruption is the spark. Discipline is what keeps the fire burning.
Discipline: the foundation of lasting change
To move beyond slogans, we need structure. Four established frameworks help shape what disciplined transformation really looks like, and they all have valuable lessons playing out right here in Australia and New Zealand.
1. Governance and decision rights - ISO/IEC 38500
This international standard sets out how boards and executives should govern technology investments: who decides, who’s accountable and how performance is measured.
In our public sector, governance discipline is still patchy. The NSW Audit Office has repeatedly found the same high-risk control issues: unclear ownership, weak oversight, and patchy documentation. It’s not a technology failure; it’s a decision-making one.
Lesson: Governance discipline isn’t bureaucracy, it’s how we protect value and confidence in delivery.
2. Operating model for value - Gartner IT Operating Model (Project → Product)
Gartner’s guidance is simple but powerful: stop managing transformation as a string of projects and start managing it as a continuous flow of value.
The Victorian Auditor-General’s Office has echoed the same principle for years. Its reports on major projects call out the need for consistent stage gates, transparent dashboards, and clear tracking of benefits, not just time and cost. The state’s IT Project Dashboard shows what’s possible when transparency is built in from the start.
Lesson: Discipline in the operating model means progress is visible, measurable, and adjustable, not just announced.
3. Benefits realisation - PMI Benefits Realisation Management Framework
PMI’s framework is about making benefits tangible and trackable. Define them early, assign owners, agree how they’ll be measured, and review them routinely.
Yet too many programs still stop at delivery. Queensland’s local government audits found only around 10%of councils met asset-management standards, because benefits weren’t tracked after implementation.
Lesson: Transformation discipline lives in the months after launch, not in the headlines that announce it.
4. Orchestrating complex change - Deloitte Transformation Office
Deloitte’s model positions a Transformation Office as the nerve centre that keeps multiple streams aligned: strategy, delivery, risk, benefits and capability.
In Queensland, the Auditor-General’s follow-up work shows just how long it can take to implement recommendations when this orchestration is missing. Without rhythm and coordination, good ideas simply fade out.
Lesson: Orchestration discipline turns good intentions into sustained results.
Putting the disciplines into practice
Discipline #1 - Focus the value (Benefits Realisation)
Don’t try to fix everything at once. Define a few clear benefits, assign ownership and track progress. Local cue: VAGO continues to report inconsistent benefits tracking across major projects. Angsana approach: Start each program with a Benefits Ledger - one owner, one measure, reviewed monthly.
Discipline #2 - Govern with clarity (Decision rights and accountability)
Clarity prevents confusion. ISO 38500 makes it explicit: know who decides, funds, and accepts risk.
Local cue: NSW audits still identify repeat control issues, a symptom of unclear accountability.
Angsana approach: Build a Decision Rights Map and a controls calendar aligned to audit expectations.
Discipline #3 - Deliver for continuity (Product and flow mindset)
Shift from project mode to value mode.
Local cue: Victoria’s IT dashboard shows how visible stage gates drive performance.
Angsana approach: Use Product Value Cards and a monthly Product Council to keep focus on value, not volume.
Discipline #4 - Orchestrate the rhythm (Transformation Office)
Keep the moving parts connected.
Local cue: Queensland’s slow implementation of audit recommendations shows how momentum gets lost.
Angsana approach: A lightweight Transformation Office that tracks dependencies, risks and 90-day outcomes.
Why the “disruption myth” endures
Because disruption looks exciting. It’s easy to celebrate a launch; harder to track performance six months later.
Because metrics lag. Many programs still measure activity, not outcomes.
Because culture catches up last. New systems arrive faster than the habits and decision-making that should sustain them.
The solution isn’t more disruption. It’s rhythm. Consistency. Transparency. That’s how change takes root.
The future belongs to those who transform with discipline
The BOM website story isn’t about poor design. It’s about the absence of delivery discipline: the link between purpose, execution and benefit. The result was an expensive launch, not a better service.
Transformation isn’t about chasing the next big thing. It’s about building capability that lasts: the systems, habits and governance that keep delivering when no one’s watching.
Disruption is a moment. Transformation is momentum. And momentum is built on discipline, the discipline to stay focused, aligned and accountable.
The organisations that will lead in Australia and New Zealand won’t be the loudest disruptors. They’ll be the ones who practise disciplined transformation every day, quietly, deliberately, and with purpose.
About the author
Irina Lindquist is the Founder and Principal of Angsana Consulting, a specialist advisory firm helping organisations turn digital ambition into lasting operational outcomes. With over two decades of transformation and technology leadership across Australia and New Zealand, Irina brings a pragmatic, disciplined approach to governance, delivery, and change. She works with executives and boards to align strategy, systems, and people by building the capability and confidence to make change stick.
Sources
AdelaideNow – Farmers say they need reliable weather data, not a new $4m website upgrade from the BoM — The Advertiser, October 2025.
Audit New Zealand – Benefits management: What good looks like and All-of-Government assurance framework.
Audit Office of New South Wales – Reports to Parliament 2023–24: State entities and cluster agencies.
Deloitte Insights – Transformation Office: Orchestrating complex transformations.
Gartner Research – Designing IT Operating Models for Product-Centric Delivery (subscriber access).
International Organization for Standardization – ISO/IEC 38500: Governance of IT.
McKinsey & Company – The State of Organizations 2023: Maintaining momentum through disciplined execution.
Project Management Institute – Benefits Realization Management: A Practice Guide and Pulse of the Profession 2024.
Queensland Audit Office – Status of Auditor-General’s recommendations and Local government asset management 2024.
Victorian Auditor-General’s Office – Major Projects Performance 2024 and Victorian Government – IT Project Dashboard.
Office of the Auditor General Western Australia – Local Government Information Systems Audit 2024.



Comments